Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Numerasi Konten Geometri Dan Pengukuran Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient
Abstract
This study aims to describe the reflective thinking ability of students with AQ climber, camper and quitter in solving numeracy problems in geometry and measurement content. This research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were six students consisting of two climber students, two camper students and two quitter students. The instruments used include numeracy questions, interview guidelines and ARP questionnaire. The results of this study showed that climber and camper students showed reflective thinking ability: description of experience based on the problem, elaboration of the experience in generating solution strategies, analysis of the experience based on solution, and evaluating the experience based on solution. In students with climber type, this ability appears optimally indicated by reflective thinking activities seen in all indicators. Meanwhile, in camper students, reflective thinking ability did not appear optimally in some components. Quitter students did not show reflective thinking ability in analysis of the experience based on solution.
Downloads
References
Aisyah, A. S., Riyadi, R., & Subanti, S. (2021). Description Of The Difficulty Of Students'mathematics Problem Solving Assessed From Adversity Quotient (AQ). Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 1161-1170. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3663
Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, Reflective, Creative Thinking and Their Reflections on Academic Achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683
Choy, S. C. & Oo, P. S. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: a precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167-182.
Fatmahanik, U. (2018). Pola Berfikir Reflektif Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient . Kodifikasia, 12(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.21154/kodifikasia.v12i2.1525
Hulaikah, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Sulton, & Murwani, F. D. (2020). The Effect of Experiential Learning and Adversity Quotient on Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13156a
Juwita, H. R., Roemintoyo, R., & Usodo, B. (2020). The Role of Adversity Quotient in the Field of Education: A Review of the Literature on Educational Development. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.507
Kholid, M. N., Sa’dijah, C., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2020). How are students’ reflective thinking for problem solving? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.688210
Kholid, M. N., Swastika, A., Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Lam, T. T., Maharani, S., Ikram, M., Murniasih, T. R., Majid, Wijaya, A. P., & Pratiwi, E. (2022). Hierarchy of Students’ Reflective Thinking Levels in Mathematical Problem Solving. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6883
King, F., WKreidler, C., Keefe, E. B., Copeland, S. R., Harste, J. C., Baten, C. E., Goodson, L., Faranak Rohani, M., Caladine, R., & Lee, L. (2010). Higher Order Thinking Skills, Definition, Teaching Strategies, Assessment A publication of the Educational Services Program, now known as the Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment. Voices from the Middle, 88(18), 495–496.
Klarita, E. N., & Syafi’ah, R. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi dan Numerasi Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal AKM Siswa Kelas V. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 3(4), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.33222/jlp.v7i2.1836
Lestari, Karunia.,Yudhanegara, Mokhammad. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Martin, & Mullis. (2017). TIMSS Assessment Frameworks. In TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana., J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis A methods sourcebook Ed.3 (3rd ed.).
Mudakir, N. F., Suratno, J., & Angkotasan, N. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear. Saintifik: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33387/saintifik.v5i1.3635.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2015). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 6737–6739. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3063
Noviyanti, E. D., Purnomo, D., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v3i1.7097
Nurhikmah, N., Rahman, A., & Upu, H. (2023). Profile of Students’ Mathematical Spatial Reasoning Ability in Cube and Block Material in terms of Adversity Quotient in Class IX on SMP Negeri 1 Galesong Utara. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum1806
Odiba, I. A., & Baba, P. A. (2013). Using Reflective Thinking Skills for Education Quality Improvement in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(16), 196–202.
Olagunju, S. O., Adenegan, K. E., & Lawal, M. O. (2015). Application of Information and Communication Technology to the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics towards Millennium Development Goals Realization in Nigeria. African Educational Research Journal, 3(1), 33–38.
Rahmawati, N. D., & Usodo, B. (2015). Profil Siswa Smp Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Yang Berkaitan Dengan Literasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (Aq). Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(5), 508–517.
Sari, C. K., Sutopo, S., & Aryuna, D. R. (2016). The profile of students’ thinking in solving mathematics problems based on Adversity Quotient . JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1784
Setiawan, J., Sudrajat, A., Aman, & Kumalasari, D. (2021). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796
Sudarman. (2011). Proses Berpikir Siswa Quitter Pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Edumatica, 1(2), 15-24.
Suharna, H. (2018). Teori Berpikir Reflektif Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Yogyakarta: Deepublish
Suttrisno, S., Habibullah, R., & Ulya, K. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Math Garden dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Numerasi pada Kelas II Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 934-943.
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient : Mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang. (7th ed.).
Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Taggart, G.L., & Wilson, A.P. (2005). Promoting reflective thinking in teacher 50
action strategies. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press
Veola, P. L. A., & Faiziyah, N. (2023). Climber, Camper, and Quitter: How Solve Ethnomathematics Based Mathematics Problem. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 6771-6781. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.2339
Copyright (c) 2024 Ika Prasetya Mukti, Endah Budi Rahaju, Budi Rahadjeng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in EDUKASIA. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
EDUKASIA's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, EDUKASIA permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and EDUKASIA on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. EDUKASIA will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JOSI will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that EDUKASIA entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
EDUKASIA will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. EDUKASIA's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
