Optimization of Mathematical Literacy through the Development of Information Literacy-Based Inquiry Learning in Secondary Education
Abstract
The low level of students’ mathematical literacy in Indonesia, as indicated by the results of the Minimum Competency Assessment and various previous studies, highlights the need to improve the instructional models used in schools. This study examines the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of developing Information Literacy-Based Inquiry Learning. The development model used in this study is adapted from Plomp which consists of five phases: (1) the preliminary investigation phase, (2) the design phase, (3) the realization/construction phase, (4) the testing, evaluation, and revision phase, and (5) the implementation phase. The subjects in this study were 63 grade X high school students in Madiun district. Data collection techniques used in this study were validation sheets, response questionnaires, and students' mathematical literacy tests. The average score from the teaching module validation was 3.86, categorized as good, and all validators confirmed that the developed mathematical literacy test instrument was valid. In the trial, the average score from the student response questionnaire was 4.02, which was also in the good category. The average student's mathematical literacy score in this trial was 79.5. Therefore, it can be concluded that the development of the model is valid, practical, and effective.
Downloads
References
Aningsih, A. (2018). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Journal Reseapedia, 1(1), 5–24.
Astuti, N. K., Fahinu, F., & Masuha, J. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Swasta Di Kota Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.36709/jppm.v6i1.7401
Blackburn, G. (2015). Effectiveness of eLearning in statistics: Pictures and stories. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(5–6), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016653704
Borthick, A. F., & Jones, D. R. (2000). The Motivation for Collaborative Discovery Learning Online and Its Application in an Information Systems Assurance Course. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(2), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2000.15.2.181
Cameron, C. E., Kim, H., Duncan, R. J., Becker, D. R., & McClelland, M. M. (2019). Bidirectional and co-developing associations of cognitive, mathematics, and literacy skills during kindergarten. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 62(December 2018), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.02.004
Catts, R. & Lau, J. (2008). Towards Information Literacy Indicators. Unesco: Paris.
Duke, N. K., Purcell‐Gates, V., Hall, L. A., & Tower, C. (2006). Authentic Literacy Activities for Developing Comprehension and Writing. The Reading Teacher, 60(4), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.60.4.4
Dwi Lestari, A., Wijayanti, R., Susilawati, L., & Insan Budi Utomo, U. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Flashcard Berbasis Akm Pada Materi Perbandingan Menggunakan Scan Qr. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR, 4(2), 311–317.
Fointuna, D. W. (2021). Applying Mamdani’s method to categorize mathematical literacy of public middle school students in Kupang. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1957(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1957/1/012009
Gonzales, N. A. (1988). A blueprint for problem posing. School Science & Mathematics, 9(8).
Hammerman, E. (2006). 8 essentials of inquiry-based science, K-8. Corwin Press.
Ilham Pratama Putra. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan 2023: Kemampuan literasi siswa SMA menurun.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2011). Models of Teaching (Eight Edition). New Jersey USA: Perason Eucation.
Juditha, C. (2019). Literasi Informasi Melawan Hoaks Bidang Kesehatan di Komunitas Online. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 16(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v16i1.1857
Kearney, W. S., & Garfield, T. (2019). Student Readiness to Learn and Teacher Effectiveness: Two Key Factors in Middle Grades Mathematics Achievement. RMLE Online, 42(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1607138
Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquiry within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Corwin Press.
Lowrie, T. (2002). Young children posing problems: The influence of teacher intervention on the type of problems children pose. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217355
Magdalena, I. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. CV Jejak (Jejak Publisher.
Maslihah, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, & Suyitno, A. (2020). The Role Of Mathematical Literacy To Improve High Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1), 012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012085
Mulyani, D. (2013). HUBUNGAN KESIAPAN BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN PRESTASI BELAJAR. Konselor, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24036/0201321729-0-00
Niss, M., & Jablonka, E. (2020). Mathematical Literacy. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 548–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100
Nursalam, Anita, N., & Sri, P. P. S. (2014). Pengaruh Penguasaan Materi Prasyarat Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas Viii Smpn 1 Sinjai Timur. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 17–30. Retrieved from http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Mapan/article/view/2718/2976
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I & II): Country notes – Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en.html
Pakpahan, R. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Capaian Literasi Matematika Siswa Indonesia Dalam Pisa 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(3), 331. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i3.496
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, T. (2012). Improving Students’ Inquiry Skills through Reflection and Self-Regulation Scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 9(1/2), 81–95. Retrieved from http://libproxy.unm.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=85423615&site=eds-live&scope=site%5Cnhttp://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=85423615&S=R&D=ehh&EbscoContent=dGJyMNLr40Sep644wtvhOLCmr0uep7FSs
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Plomp, T. (1997). Educational Design: Introduction. From Tjeerd Plomp (eds). Educational & Training System Design: Introduction. Design of Education and Training (in Dutch). Utrecht (the Netherlands): Lemma. Netherlands: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente.
Putri, D. J., Angelina, S., Claudia, S., & Mujazi, R. M. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat belajar siswa di kecamatan larangan tangerang. (9).
Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 042088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088
Saputro. (2011). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Media Visual Basic Net 2008 pada Materi Lingkaran di Kelas VIIIB MTs Negeri Krian Sidoarjo. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya Fakultas Tarbiyah Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika.
Setiani, C., Waluya, S. B., & Wardono. (2018). Analysis of mathematical literacy ability based on self-efficacy in model eliciting activities using metaphorical thinking approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012139
Setianingsih, W. L., Ekayanti, A., & Jumadi, J. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (Akm). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5915
Shriki, A. (2013). A Model for Assessing the Development of Students’ Creativity in the Context of Problem Posing. Creative Education, 04(07), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47062
Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing students’ mathematical problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 129–135.
Soeprianto, H., Sarjana, I. K., & Hapipi, H. (2018). IMPLEMENTASI STANDAR PROSES PADA PEMBUATAN RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN BAGI PARA GURU DI GUGUS III CAKRANEGARA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppm.v1i1.483
Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Pradnya, I. N. (2019). Integrating character education in mathematics learning in Indonesia and Denmark. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 032014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032014
Sulfayanti, N. (2023). Kajian Literatur: Faktor dan Solusi untuk Mengatasi Rendahnya Literasi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 3(04), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v3i04.590
Susanti, Vera D., Sukestriyarno, Kharisudin, I., & Agoestanto, A. (2022). The Effect Of The Inquiry Learning Model With The Scaffolding Strategy On Students’ Mathematical Literacy. Iset: International Conference on Science, Education and Technology, 1066–1069. Retrieved from https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/iset
Susanti, Vera Dewi, Suprapto, E., & Wardani, Y. A. (2022). Development of Android-Based Edutainment Game Learning Media on Phytagoras Theorem for Junior High School Students. 14, 3931–3942. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1978
Wijayanti, R., Waluya, S. B., & Masrukan. (2018). Analysis of mathematical literacy ability based on goal orientation in model eliciting activities learning with murder strategy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012141
Yusup, P. M., & Saepudin, E. (2017). PRAKTIK LITERASI INFORMASI DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN SEPANJANG HAYAT (INFORMATION LITERACY PRACTICES IN THE PROCESS OF LIFELONG LEARNING). Jurnal Kajian Informasi Dan Perpustakaan, 5(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v5i1.11387
Copyright (c) 2024 Vera Dewi Susanti, YL Sukestiyarno, Iqbal Kharisudin, Arief Agoestanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in EDUKASIA. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
EDUKASIA's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, EDUKASIA permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and EDUKASIA on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. EDUKASIA will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JOSI will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that EDUKASIA entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
EDUKASIA will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. EDUKASIA's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
