Innovation in Blended Learning: A Solution to the Shortage of Computer Laboratories in Information, Communication, and Technology Courses

Sagiman Sagiman; Laras Shesa; Muhammad Istan; Ruly Morganna

doi:10.62775/edukasia.v7i1.1808

Authors

Sagiman Sagiman Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9143-444X
Laras Shesa Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup
Muhammad Istan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2479-3802
Ruly Morganna Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2188-2511

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v7i1.1808

Keywords:

instructional innovation, blended learning, learning model

Abstract

Advances in digital technology have created substantial opportunities for instructional innovation, particularly in higher education institutions facing limitations in physical facilities such as computer laboratories. This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a blended learning model supported by Google Classroom as a solution to the shortage of computer laboratories in the Information and Communication Technology course. The research method employed was research and development with an instructional design approach based on the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Data were collected through observations, interviews, questionnaires, and analysis of student performance within the blended learning environment. The findings revealed that the blended learning model not only enhanced students’ learning independence but also improved teaching effectiveness by optimizing digital resources. Moreover, the implementation of Google Classroom provided flexibility in accessing materials, facilitated more dynamic interaction, and reduced the operational burden on computer laboratories. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of digital instructional strategies with the specific needs of faith-based higher education institutions, which remain underexplored in the higher education literature. Accordingly, this study contributes to the development of adaptive instructional models that can be applied in other educational institutions facing similar infrastructural constraints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abekiri, N., Ajaamoum, M., Rachdy, A., Nassiri, B., & Benydir, M. (2024). Towards hybrid technical learning: Transforming traditional Laboratories for distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(5), e22771. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22771

Alam, M. J., & Ogawa, K. (2024). Future-readiness and employable ICT skills of university graduates in Bangladesh: An analysis during the post-covid era. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2359014. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2359014

Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 531–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z

Arikarani, Y., & Amirudin, M. F. (2021). Pemanfaatan Media dan Teknologi Digital Dalam Mengatasi Masalah Pembelajaran Dimasa Pandemi. Ej, 4(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.37092/ej.v4i1.296

Arora, A. K., Rodriguez, C., Carver, T., Zhang, H., & Schuster, T. (2024). Validation of the Blended Learning Usability Evaluation–Questionnaire (BLUE-Q) through an innovative Bayesian questionnaire validation approach. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 21, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.31

Attridge, E., & O’Mahony, T. (2025). ‘I could replicate the situation exactly the same as I do in class’: Apprentice lecturers use of a learning management system at an Irish university during and after COVID-19. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2025.2507582

Batista-Toledo, S., & Gavilan, D. (2025). A Blended Learning Future: COVID-19 Lessons for “Phygital” Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8259

Cao, Y., Yan, Z., Yang, L., Panadero, E., & Chen, C. (2025). Technology-mediated self-assessment in higher education: A critical review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep588. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16739

Chaves-Yuste, B., & de-la-Peña, C. (2025). Impact of Digital Resources on ESP Academic Performance. TESOL Journal, 16(2), e70037. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.70037

Chen, M., Wang, Z., Liang, L., Ma, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024). Typical Practical Cases in Blended Learning. In M. Li, X. Han, & J. Cheng (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Reform Through Blended Learning (pp. 231–378). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6269-3_6

Cosa, M., & Torelli, R. (2024). Digital Transformation and Flexible Performance Management: A Systematic Literature Review of the Evolution of Performance Measurement Systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00409-9

Dehghani, G., & Ghaffarifar, S. (2024). Readiness for self-directed learning among basic sciences medical students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1849_23

Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Effect of blended learning approach on secondary school learners’ mathematics achievement and retention. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19863–19888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12651-w

Fabian, K., Smith, S., & Taylor-Smith, E. (2024). Being in Two Places at the Same Time: A Future for Hybrid Learning Based on Student Preferences. TechTrends, 68(4), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00974-x

Fakhri, J., Sada, H. J., Saputra, M. I., Jamil, S., & Mursyidah, D. (2023). Performing Hybrid Learning at Islamic Higher Education Institusions for Mitigating Learning Loss. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 223–240.

Farias-Gaytan, S., Aguaded, I., & Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S. (2023). Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 386. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9

Fisher, D. P., Brotto, G., Lim, I., & Southam, C. (2025). The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2449891

Godsk, M., & Møller, K. L. (2025). Engaging students in higher education with educational technology. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 2941–2976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12901-x

Gupta, A., & Pathania, P. (2021). To study the impact of Google Classroom as a platform of learning and collaboration at the teacher education level. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 843–857.

Hussein, M. H., Ow, S. H., Al-Azawei, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2022). What drives students’ successful reuse of online learning in higher education? A case of Google Classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7335

Ilham, M., Mujiyati, S., & Saefudin, A. (2023). Efektivitas Blended Learning pada Pembelajaran Teknologi Pendidikan Mahasiswa Semester 4 Prodi PAI. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.692

Jeong, J. S., & González-Gómez, D. (2022). Editorial: Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral, and Multidimensional Domain Research in STEM Education: Active Approaches and Methods Towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881153

Kang, H. Y., & Kim, H. R. (2021). Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: A review of flipped classroom with team-based learning. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y

Kayi, E. A. (2024). Transitioning to blended learning during COVID-19: Exploring instructors and adult learners’ experiences in three Ghanaian universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2760–2786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13475

Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., & Osman, S. (2020). Google classroom: Insights from Malaysian higher education students’ and instructors’ experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4175–4195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10163-x

Mahfiroh, S., Mustika, L. R. A., Rojaenah, S., & Sulianto, J. (2025). Analysis of School Readiness in Developing School Digitalization at MA Al Hikmah Kajen. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, Dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 10(1), 465–484.

McCarthy, S., & Palmer, E. (2023). Defining an effective approach to blended learning in higher education: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8489

Mei, Q., Chan, N. N., Gill, R. S., Subramaniam, N., Motevalli, S., & Ang, C.-S. (2025). Impact of attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction (ARCS) model on teaching effectiveness in higher education: A systematic review. Discover Education, 4(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00674-5

Mizza, D., Reese, M., & Malouche, D. (2025). Flipped classroom evaluation and blended learning potential: A case study of engagement and inclusion in quantitative education. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00412-2

Müller, F. A., & Wulf, T. (2020). Technology-supported management education: A systematic review of antecedents of learning effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00226-x

National Education Association. (2021). Checklist for Blended Learning. https://www.nea.org/professional-excellence/student-engagement/tools-tips/checklist-blended-learning

Ndibalema, P. (2025). Digital literacy gaps in promoting 21st century skills among students in higher education institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2452085. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2452085

Perrotta, C., Gulson, K. N., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2021). Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1855597

Radovan, M., Radovan, D. M., Radovan, M., & Radovan, D. M. (2024). Harmonizing Pedagogy and Technology: Insights into Teaching Approaches That Foster Sustainable Motivation and Efficiency in Blended Learning. Sustainability, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072704

Rasimin, Semma, A. B., Zakiyuddin, Ali, M., & Helmy, M. I. (2024). Multi-dimensional challenges in the Indonesian social science information technology-based learning: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28706

Sala, R., Maffei, A., Pirola, F., Enoksson, F., Ljubić, S., Skoki, A., Zammit, J. P., Bonello, A., Podržaj, P., Žužek, T., Priarone, P. C., Antonelli, D., & Pezzotta, G. (2024). Blended learning in the engineering field: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(3), e22712. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22712

Shohel, M. M. C., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Azim, F., Naomee, I., Rahman, M. S., & Siddik, M. A. B. (2022). Blended learning space for primary and secondary education: Challenges and opportunities in resource-constrained contexts. Designing Effective Distance and Blended Learning Environments in K-12, 187–222.

Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., & Fryer, L. K. (2025). Assessment of class participation in online and offline learning environments: A qualitative investigation of teachers’ best practices and challenges. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(5), 1191–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2462024

Stokes, J. A. (2022). Using Google Tools to Increase Student Learning, Engagement, and Collaboration in Remote, Hybrid, and In-person Courses. The FASEB Journal, 36(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2523

Ulfah, U., & Saeful Anwar. (2024). Inovasi Digital dalam Pendidikan Islam: Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran dan Keterlibatan Mahasiswa. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.30999/ululalbab.v2i1.3354

Vancoillie, L., Fryling, M., & Samei, E. (2025). Relevance and application of digital project management in academic research: A case study in a Medical Physics lab and practice. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 26(9), e70242. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70242

Xu, B. (2024). Technology integration into Chinese as a foreign language learning in higher education: An integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review (2000–2024). Language Teaching Research, 13621688241277911. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241277911