Psychometric Properties of the Classroom English Proficiency (CEP) Scale for English Language Teachers in Indonesia: A CFA and Rasch Model Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v7i1.1842Keywords:
Classroom English Proficiency Scale, Confirmatory Factor Analysis , English Teacher, Psychometric Properties, Rasch ModelAbstract
This study aimed to adapt and validate the Classroom English Proficiency Scale (CEPS) for English language teachers in Indonesia using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and the Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM). The CFA confirmed that the four latent dimensions—Grammar, Pronunciation, Interaction, and Instruction—fit well within a second-order structure representing a single construct of classroom English proficiency. Rasch analysis further supported the unidimensionality assumption, with variance explained by measures exceeding the recommended criterion. The scale showed high reliability, and all items met model-fit expectations. The five-point Likert rating scale functioned effectively, with ordered Andrich thresholds and consistent category use. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis indicated that 11 of 12 items were invariant across gender groups, except CEPS_2 (“I can use a wide range of English vocabulary”), which was slightly more difficult for male respondents. Overall, the Indonesian-adapted CEPS demonstrated strong validity, reliability, and fairness, confirming its suitability for assessing English proficiency in classroom contexts. The CEPS can serve as a reliable diagnostic and evaluative tool for English language teachers in teacher education and EFL assessment settings.
Downloads
References
Al-Barakat, A. A., Al-Hassan, O. M., AlAli, R. M., Bataineh, R. F., Aboud, Y. Z., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2025). Shaping Young Minds: How Teachers Foster Social Interaction, Psychological Security and Motivational Support in the Primary Language Classroom. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(1), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.18
Ali, Z., Masroor Farzana, & Khan, T. (2020). Creating Positive Classroom Environment For Learners’ Motivation Towards Communicative Competence In The English Language. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan , 57(1), 317–328.
Andrich, D. (1978). Application of a psychometric model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(4), 581–594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167800200413
Aramaki, T. (2025). Task-supported and task-based language teaching and their effects on task motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2548577
Bentler, P. M. (2017). Specificity-enhanced reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000092
Bodoff, D. (2008). Test theory for evaluating reliability of IR test collections. Information Processing & Management, 44(3), 1117–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.11.006
Bond, T. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698
Bond, T., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2020). Applying the Rasch Model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030499
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING. Journal: APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 1, 1–47.
Chacón, C. T. (2005). Teachers’ perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.001
Chambless, K. S. (2012). Teachers’ Oral Proficiency in the Target Language: Research on Its Role in Language Teaching and Learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01183.x
Chong, J., Mokshein, S. E., & Mustapha, R. (2021). Applying the Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM) to investigate the rating scales function in survey research instrument. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.39130
Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (2013). Rasch Models in Health. NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
DE JONG, N. H., STEINEL, M. P., FLORIJN, A., SCHOONEN, R., & HULSTIJN, J. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000069
Fan, J., & Bond, T. (2019). Applying Rasch measurement in language assessment. In Quantitative Data Analysis for Language Assessment Volume I (pp. 83–102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187815-5
Freeman, D. (2017). The Case for Teachers’ Classroom English Proficiency. RELC Journal, 48(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217691073
Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1994). Comparison of Empirical and Judgmental Procedures for Detecting Differential Item Functioning. Educational Research Quarterly, 18(1), 21–36.
Holster, T. A., & Lake, J. (2016). Guessing and the Rasch Model. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1160096
Ismailov, M., Chiu, T. K., Aizawa, I., Yamamoto, Y., Djalilova, N., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2025). Essential Lecturer Competencies in English Medium Instruction: A Study Across Student Proficiency Levels. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241312427
Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2016). The non-native English speaker teachers in TESOL movement. ELT Journal, 70(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv076
Karimah, S. A., Yundianto, D., Idris, M. M., & Zulha, H. F. (2025). PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SELF-EFFICACY SCALE FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN INDONESIA. English Review: Journal of English Education, 13(2), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v13i2.10954
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Understanding Rasch measurement: Optimizing Rating Scale Category Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106.
Linacre, J. M. (2018). DIF-DPF-bias-interactions concepts. Winsteps Help for Rasch Analysis. Https://Www.Winsteps.Com/Winman/Difconcepts.Htm.
Matsumura, S., & Hinoki, Y. (2024). Empowering Non-Specialist English Teachers: Self-Efficacy Enhancement Through Classroom English Proficiency and Collaborative Support. Education Sciences, 15(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010024
Medgyes P. (2001). When the teacher is a non-native speaker. In: Celcie-Murcia M (ed.) English as a Second or Foreign Language. Teaching Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 415–427.
Medvedev, O. N., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2025). Rasch Measurement Model. In Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research (pp. 131–147). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47219-0_4
Megbele, A. M., Odili, J. N., & Osadebe, P. U. (2023). ASSESSMENT OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF ATTITUDE TOWARDS ASSESSMENT TEST (ATAT). European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v8i3.5054
Narzillayevna, A. S. (2024). THE IMPACT OF SELF-CONFIDENCE ON THE ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE SKILLS: ASYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Eurasian Journal of Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy, 2(1), 11–16.
Nguyen, T. A. (2025). Addressing English-speaking anxiety in Vietnamese initial teacher education: beyond coping strategies. Asian. J. Second. Foreign. Lang. Educ, 10(24).
Numonova, M. (2024). COMMUNICATIVE METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH VOCABULARY AND GRAMMAR IN CONTEXT. QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 13, 327–330. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v13i.1090
Nyström, F. (2025). Opportunities for speaking: the if, how and when of students’ spoken target language in the second foreign language classroom. Moderna Språk, 119(2), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v119i2.24076
Pham, T. H. N. (2018). General English Proficiency or English for Teaching? The Preferences of In-service Teachers. RELC Journal, 49(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217691446
Rahman, Y. A. (2023). Person and Item Validity and Reliability in Essay Writing Using Rasch Model. Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 15(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v15i1.2618
Richards, J. C. (2017). Teacher language proficiency and classroom communication. Cambridge University Press.
Sahnan, B., & Daulay, S. H. (2025). Developing Students’ Vocabulary by Using Build-A-Sentence: Teachers’ Perspective. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 692. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i2.22547
Santoso, A., Afendi, F. M., Pardede, T., Retnawati, H., Rafi, I., Apino, E., & Rosyada, M. N. (2025). Deep-Rasch as an Alternative to Rasch Modeling under Assumption Violations and Small Sample Sizes. CAUCHY: Jurnal Matematika Murni Dan Aplikasi, 10(2), 970–985. https://doi.org/10.18860/cauchy.v10i2.36276
Selvi, A. F., Yazan, B., & Mahboob, A. (2024). Research on “native” and “non-native” English-speaking teachers: Past developments, current status, and future directions. Language Teaching, 57(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000137
Waddington, J. (2022). Rethinking the ‘ideal native speaker’ teacher in early childhood education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1898630
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826
Wang, C. (2021). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Classroom English Proficiency and Their Teaching Self-Efficacy in an English Medium Instruction Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611743
Zega, Y. S. (2025). Effective strategies for enhancing English speaking competence among learners in English education study programs. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 2(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.71028/jescs.v2i2.27
Zhang, Q. (2025). The role of EFL teacher immediacy and teacher-student rapport in boosting motivation to learn and academic mindsets in online education. Learning and Motivation, 89, 102092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102092
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syahadah Albaqiyatul Karimah, Devie Yundianto, Muhammad Aqil Alaauddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




