Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa Laki-Laki Maskulin dan Perempuan Feminin dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Literasi Numerasi pada Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to describe the critical thinking of masculine male and feminine female students in solving numeracy literacy problems in the minimum competency assessment. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The data collection method used the Bem Sex Role Inventory test to determine gender tendencies, giving math ability tests, giving problem solving assignments and interviews to determine students' critical thinking profiles. The research subjects consisted of two grade VIII junior high school students with masculine male and feminine female gender with moderate math ability. The results showed that masculine male students could fulfill all critical thinking indicators, while feminine female students could not fulfill one of the critical thinking indicators, namely analyzing problems with mathematical concepts. In addition, masculine male and feminine female students have different ways or solutions in solving numeracy literacy problems in the minimum competency assessment.
Downloads
References
Alamsyah, Sakti & Sudrajat. 2021. Belajar Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Yohyakarta: CV Budi Utama
Annisa, Refli. dkk. 2021. Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Gender. Jurnal Kependidikan, 7(2), 483. Online Publication. DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352194492_Analisis_Kemampuan_Pemecahan_Masalah_Matematis_Siswa_SMP_Berdasarkan_Gender
As’ari, Abdur Rahman. Dkk. 2017. Matematika Kelas VIII. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia
Cahyono, Budi. 2016. Korelasi Pemecahan Masalah dan Indikator Berfikir Kritis. Phenomenon Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 20. Di unduh dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348834322_Korelasi_Pemecahan_Masalah_dan_Indikator_Berfikir_Kritis
Conn, Charles & Robert McLean. 2019. Bulletproof Problem Solving: The One Skill That Changes Everything. Canada : Wiley
Eisner, Howard. 2021. Problem Solving Leaning on New Thinking Skills. UK: Oxford University Press
Ennis, Robert H. 1996. Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability. UC : CRC Press.
Facione, Peter & Carol Ann Gittens. 2016. Think Critically. Amerika: Pearson Education.
Facione, Peter. 2015. Critical Thinking: What It Is And Why It Counts. Measured Reasons LLC & Insight Assessment. Diunduh dari
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251303244_Critical_Thinking_What_It_Is_and_Why_It_Counts
Ganley, Colleen. (14 Agustus 2018). Are Boys Better Than Girls at Math ?. Scientific American. Diunduh dari
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-boys-better-than-girls-at-math/
Ghony, M Djunaidi & Fauzan Almanshur. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Giberti, Chiara. 2019. Gender differences in mathematics: from the international literature to the Italian context. Journal of University of Bergamo, 2019(5), 47-49. Online Publication. .DOI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333098729_Gender_differences_in_mathematics_from_the_international_literature_to_the_Italian_context
Gondal, Aman Ullah. 1995. Gender Studies. Pakistan
Hadi, Samsul & Munawir Gazali. 2022. Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta : Perkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia
Hamda. 2020. Profil Berpikir Konseptual Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika dalam Memecahkan Masalah Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gender. (Disertasi tidak diterbitkan), Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya.
Hardani, 2020. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta : CV Pustaka Ilmu Group
Hidayanti, Resky. 2020. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender Pada Siswa Kelas VIII.1 SMP Negeri 2 Labakkang. Suara Intelektual Gaya Matematika, 12 (1), 79. Diunduh dari https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/sigma/article/view/3913/2666
Hyytinen, Heidi., dkk. 2021. The dynamic relationship between response processes and self-regulation in critical thinking assessments. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71 (2021), 1-12. Diunduh dari https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X21001164
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. [Online]. Tersedia di https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/matematika Diakses 3 Juni 2022.
Kallet, Michael. 2014. Think Smarter (Critical Thinking to Improve Problem-Solving-making Skilss). Canada : New Jersey
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Jakarta
Krulik, Stephen & Rudnick, Jesse A. 1988. Problem Solving: A Handbook For Elementary School Teachers. London: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Marni, Silvia dkk. 2019. Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Gender And Knowladge Group. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17 (4), 549. Diunduh dari https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/1246/641
Megawangi, Ratna. 1999. Membiarkan berbeda?. Bandung: mizan.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah menengah Pertama/madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi RI Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 tentang AsesMen Nasional. Jakarta.
Meyers-Levy, J. 1989. Gender Differences in Information Processing: A Selectivity Interpretation. Lexington: Lexingtonn Books.
Monto, M.A. (1993). An Exercise in Gender. The BEM Sex Role Inventory in the Classroom. Clinical Sosiology Revie, 11(1), 13.
Mosse, Julia Cleves. 1993. Gender and Development. Yogyakarta : Rifka Annisa
Mukhadis. 2018. Pendekatan Kuantilatif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan. Malang: Media Nusa Crative
Novianti, Dwi Erna. 2021. Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) dan Kaitannya dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Prosiding Nasional Pendidikan LPPM IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, 2(1), 85-91. Diunduh dari https://prosiding.ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id/index.php/Prosiding/article/view/1144
Nurmitasari N dan Robia A. 2017. Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa MTs pada Bangun Datar ditinjau dari jenis Kelamin. Jurnal Edumath 3 (2) : 118
Paul, Richard dan Linda Elder. 2020. Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
Polya, G. 2004. How to Solve It : a new aspect of mathematical method. USA: Princeton University Press
Programme for International Student Assessment. 2018. PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Framework.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. 2021. Framework Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Jakarta.
Ramdhan, Muhammad. 2021. Metode Penelitian. Surabaya : Cipta Media Nusantara
Sani, Ridwan Abdullah. 2021. Pembelajaran Berorientasi AKM. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Suharna, Hery. 2018. Teori Berpikir Reflektif dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Yogyakarta. CV Budi Utama
Sulistiyawati. 2017. Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gender Siswa. Wacana Akademika: Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(2), 137. Online Publication. DOI: https://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/wacanaakademika/article/view/1289
Susilowati, E. dkk. 2020. Relationship Between the Problem Solving Ability of Critical Thinking Skills on Series Material. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 5(1), 122. Diunduh dari https://snllb.ulm.ac.id/prosiding/index.php/snllb-lit/article/view/331/333
Suttrisno, S. (2021). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Alat Peraga Ips Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 77-90.
Suttrisno., N. M. Y. (2022). Teacher Competency Development in Designing Learning in the Independent Curriculum. AL-MUDARRIS: Journal of Education, 5(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.32478/al-mudarris.v
Suttrisno, S., & Puspitasari, H. (2021). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Bahasa Indonesia Membaca dan Menulis Permulaan (MMP) Untuk Siswa Kelas Awal. Tarbiyah Wa Ta’lim: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 8(2), 83–91. Retrieved from https://journal.uinsi.ac.id/index.php/Tarbiyawat/article/view/3303
Suttrisno, S., Istiani, N., & Habibulloh, M. R. (2022). Analisis Manajemen Program Bahasa Inggris Kelas Unggulan di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. IBTIDA, 3(02), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.37850/ibtida.v3i02.360
Triningtyas, Diana Ariswati. 2017. Survey Permasalahan Bimbingan dan Konseling. Magetan : CV. AE Medika Grafika.
US-Based Partnership For 21st Century Skills. 2008. 21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness.
Wahyudi & Indri Anugraheni. 2017. Strategi Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Salatiga : Satya Wacana University Press
Wardani, Wahyu., dkk. 2018. Pengaruh Gender terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Program IPS pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi. 3(12), 1530. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Diunduh dari http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/11786
Copyright (c) 2022 Reni Rachmawati, Dwi Juniati, Atik Wintarti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in EDUKASIA. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
EDUKASIA's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, EDUKASIA permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and EDUKASIA on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. EDUKASIA will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JOSI will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that EDUKASIA entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
EDUKASIA will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. EDUKASIA's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
