Identifikasi Penalaran Kreatif-Imitatif Siswa dengan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif

  • Durrotun Nabilah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Ismail Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Elly Matul Imah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Keywords: Creative-Imitative Reasoning, Reflectif-Style;cept, Problem-Solving


This research is aimed to describe the creative and imitative reasoning of students with reflective cognitive styles on math problem solving. The study uses a qualitative approach with a data collection instrument used of Matching Familiar Figure Tests, math ability test, mathematical problem-solving tasks, and interview guidelines. The research result studies indicate that a student with reflective cognitive style that have imitative reasoning in problem solving is less able to provide comprehensive information, still using a problem-solving strategy previously known, nor does he make a return check on the results received. It is different with reflective subjects that have proven creative reasoning capable of delivering well-known information, that can provide novel and thought-provoking solutions. Moreover, he also looking back the resulting solutions to the problem.


Download data is not yet available.


Bendall, R. C. A., Lambert, S., Galpin, A., Marrow, L. P., & Cassidy, S. (2019). Psychophysiological indices of cognitive style: A triangulated study incorporating neuroimaging, eye-tracking, psychometric and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 144(November 2018), 68–78.
Bouckenooghe, D., Cools, E., De Clercq, D., Vanderheyden, K., & Fatima, T. (2016). Exploring the impact of cognitive style profiles on different learning approaches: Empirical evidence for adopting a person-centered perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 299–306.
Jäder, J., Sidenvall, J., & Sumpter, L. (2016). Students’ Mathematical Reasoning and Beliefs in Non-routine Task Solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 759–776.
Kaur, B., & Toh, T. L. (2012). Reasoning, Communication and Connections in A-Level Mathematics. In Reasoning, Communication and Connections in Mathematics (pp. 1–10).
Kholodnaya, M. A., & Volkova, E. V. (2016). Conceptual Structures, Conceptual Abilities and Productivity of Cognitive Functioning: The Ontological Approach1. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 914–922.
Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(4), 405–427.
Lithner, J. (2006). A framework for analysing creative and imitative mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 255–276.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 937–949.
Mac an Bhaird, C., Nolan, B., O’Shea, A., & Pfeiffer, K. (2014). An Analysis of The Opportunities for Creative Reasoning in Undergraduate Calculus Courses. DCU.
Mckinney, J. D., Porter, F., Child, G., Carolina, N., Hill, C., Haskins, R., Mason, J., Rosser, B., & Mckinney, D. (1975). Problem-Solving Strategies in Reflective and Impulsive Children training procedures which merely operate. Child Development, 67(6), 807–820.
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D. (2016). Creative Cognitive Processes in Higher Education. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), 282–293.
Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T., & Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55(April 2018), 100701.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive Styles — an overview and integration. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 11(3–4), 193–215.
Rozencwajg, P., & Corroyer, D. (2005). Cognitive processes in the reflective-impulsive cognitive style. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(4), 451–463.
Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 37–52.
Suttrisno, S. (2021). Analisis Dampak Pembelajaran Daring terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Riset Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 1(1), 348380.
Suttrisno, S. (2021). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Alat Peraga Ips Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 77-90.
Suttrisno, S., & Puspitasari, H. (2021). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Bahasa Indonesia Membaca dan Menulis Permulaan (MMP) Untuk Siswa Kelas Awal. Tarbiyah Wa Ta'lim: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 83-91.
Suttrisno, S., Riyanto, Y., & Subroto, W. T. (2020). Pengaruh Model Value Clarification Technique (Vct) Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. NATURALISTIC: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 718-729.
Suttrisno, S., Yulia, N. M., & Fithriyah, D. N. (2022). Mengembangkan Kompetensi Guru Dalam Melaksanakan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Di Era Merdeka Belajar. ZAHRA: Research and Tought Elementary School of Islam Journal, 3(1), 52-60.
Suttrisno, S., & Yulia, N. M. (2022). Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru dalam Mendesain Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum Merdeka/Teacher Competency Development in Designing Learning in the Independent Curriculum. Al-Mudarris: Journal Of Education, 5(1), 30-44.
Volkova, E. (2014). The Nature of Creativity: Differentiation-Integration Approach. Humanities and Social Science Review, 3(2), 375–388.
Vranic, A., Rebernjak, B., & Martincevic, M. (2019). Cognitive style: The role of personality and need for cognition in younger and older adults. Current Psychology.
Warli. (2010). Instrumen Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). ISTRU/WARLI/2010
Wulandari, N. H., Widayati, K. A., & Suryobroto, B. (2016). Cognitive Style and Creative Quality: Influence on Academic Achievement of University Students in Indonesia. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 23(3), 121–124.
Yasuda, T. (2019). An exploratory study for factorial validity of cognitive styles among Japanese adult EFL learners: from educational and cultural perspectives. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4(1), 1–20.
How to Cite
Durrotun Nabilah, Ismail, & Elly Matul Imah. (2023). Identifikasi Penalaran Kreatif-Imitatif Siswa dengan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 119-126.