Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning, Cooperative Learning, dan Gaya Berpikir Siswa terhadap Kemampuan Memahami Konsep Mata Pelajaran PPKn Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 57 dan 49 Surabaya

  • Ruti Diah Puspita Djelita Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Achmad Noor Fatirul Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Yoso Wiyarno Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
Keywords: The Contextual Teaching And Learning Method; Cooperative Method Learning; Thinking Style

Abstract

This study focuses on the existence of significant differences in the ability to understand concepts between students who are taught by contextual teaching and learning and cooperative learning methods, there are significant differences in the ability to understand concepts between students who have a concrete sequential thinking style, abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract randomization, as well as the interaction between learning methods and thinking styles on the ability to understand the concepts of Civics subjects for class VIII students at SMP Negeri 57 and 49 Surabaya. This type of research is experimental research. Quasi-experimental research design using a non-equivalent control group design. The population of this study were class VIII students of SMP Negeri 57 and 49 Surabaya for the 2022/2023 academic year. The research sample used a sampling technique with details of 72 students in the experimental class and 70 students in the control class. The data collection method is to use a student thinking style test instrument and a test of the ability to understand "Strengthening National Commitment." Methods of data analysis using Two Way Anava. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant difference between the treatment of students who are taught using the contextual teaching and learning method compared to the cooperative learning method. There are differences in the ability to understand concepts in students who have concrete sequential, abstract sequential, random concrete, and random abstract thinking styles between groups of students who are treated with the contextual teaching and learning method compared to the cooperative learning method. There is interaction between learning methods and thinking styles on the ability to understand concepts as a result of each different characteristic of each student in terms of their respective thinking styles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, Abu, dan Joko Tri Prasetyo. 2005. Strategi Belajar- Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Arikunto, S. 2012. “Penelitian tindakan kelas.”

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Cet-15. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bobbi Deporter, Mike Hernacki. 2015. Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Kelima. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.

Dakhi, Agustin Sukses. 2020. “Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa.” Jurnal Education and development 8 (2): 468–70.

Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN Ar-Raniry, Dosen. 2015. “Perkembangan Kognitif: Teori Jean Piaget.” Intelektualita 3 (1): 27–38. https://www.jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/intel/article/view/197.

Ghozali, Imam. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hasibuan, Idrus. 2014. “Model Pembelajaran CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning).” Logaritma : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains 2 (1): 1–12.

Molenda, Michael, Charles Reigeluth, dan Laurie Miller-Nelson. 2013. “Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status.” Instructional Design, 574–78. http://scholar.google.com.my/scholar?q=instructional+design+model&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_ylo=2010&as_yhi=2013#0.

Muhlasin. 2019. “Manajemen Pembelajaran dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar.” Carbohydrate Polymers 6 (1): 5–10.

N, Senduk A. 2003. “Pembelajaran Kontekstual CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning).” Universitas Negeri Malang. Skripsi, Universita Negeri Malang. https://www.tripven.com/pembelajaran-ctl/.

Purwanto. 2017. “Konseling Kelompok dengan Teknik Role Playing untuk Membentuk Sikap Negatif Siswa terhadap Perilaku Bullying.” Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling 6 (2): 101–5.

Sanusi, Achmad. 2013. Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.

Shanti, Widha Nur, Dyahsih Alin Sholihah, dan Ahmad Anis Abdullah. 2018. “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui CTL.” Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika 5 (1): 98–110.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutama, S, dan Binta Anggitasari. 2019. “Gaya dan Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Siswa SMK.” Manajemen Pendidikan 13 (2): 52–61. https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v13i2.6396.

Taniredja, Tukiran, dan Hidayati Musdalifah. 2014. Penelitian Kuantitatif: Sebuah Pengantar. Cet-3. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wahrudin, Bambang, dan Mukhibat Mukhibat. 2017. “Pola Pembinaan Kompetensi Kepribadian dan Kompetensi Sosial Guru di SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Ponorogo.” Nadwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 11 (2): 137–56. https://doi.org/10.21580/nw.2017.11.2.1832.

Wakijo, Wakijo, dan Siti Suprihatin. 2016. “Implementasi pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (ctl) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa.” PROMOSI (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi) 4 (2).

Zakiah, L., dan I Lestari. 2019. Berpikir Kritis Dalam Konteks Pembelajaran. Bogor: Erzatama Karya Abadi.

Published
2023-08-19
How to Cite
Djelita, R. D. P., Fatirul, A. N., & Wiyarno, Y. (2023). Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning, Cooperative Learning, dan Gaya Berpikir Siswa terhadap Kemampuan Memahami Konsep Mata Pelajaran PPKn Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 57 dan 49 Surabaya. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 1669-1680. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.470