Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Learning Cycle untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara
Abstract
This study describes the development of learning cycle teaching materials that are valid, effective, and practical for improving students' mathematics learning outcomes in class VIII SMP Tapanuli Utara and improving student mathematics learning outcomes using teaching materials based on the learning cycle method developed in class VIII SMP Tapanuli District North. As subjects in this study were class VIII students of SMP Negeri 2 Parmonangan for the 2021/2022 Academic Year. As subjects in this study were class VIII students of SMP Negeri 2 Parmonangan for the 2021/2022 Academic Year. The object of this research is mathematics teaching materials which are developed based on the learning cycle learning method to improve mathematics learning outcomes in the Pythagorean Theorem material. The research model is development research with a modification of the Borg and Gall development procedure. Development research is generally divided into 3 (three) stages, namely the problem identification stage, the design stage, and the deployment stage. The results of the study stated that the teaching materials based on the learning cycle method developed were valid, effective, and practical to use to improve students' mathematics learning outcomes in class VIII of SMP Tapanuli Utara. Teaching materials based on the learning cycle method developed can improve student learning outcomes in class VIII of SMP Tapanuli Utara. Obtaining arithmetic results or an N-Gain value of 0.64 with the category of moderate or good learning improvement results.
Downloads
References
Amri, S. dan Ahmadi K. I. (2010). Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif Dalam Kelas. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka Raya
Arends, R. I. (2008). Belajar untuk mengajar. New York: McGraw Hills.
Ariawan, S., Sukanca, E., & Wardani, M. T. (2023). Administrasi Pendidikan (Cetakan I; M. Pd. Dr. An An Andari, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Sulur Pustaka.
Arikunto, S. 2003, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, edisi revisi, Bumi Aksara, Yogyakarta
Armanto, D. 2004. Aspek Perubahan Pendidikan Dasar Matematika Melalui Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (PMR). Makalah disampaikan pada seminar nasional sehari Penerapan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik pada Sekolah dan Madrasah, tanggal 5 Nopember 2001, Medan. Tesis. Tidak diterbitkan
B. Weil, J. and Calhoun. 2000. Models Of Teaching. Newyork: A Person Education Company.
Baharuddin, 2009, Pendidikan dan Psikologi Perkembangan, Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
Belawati, T. 2003. Pengembangan bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan UT
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dahar, RW.. (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Degeng, I. 2000. Ilmu Pengajaran Taksonomi Variabel. Jakarta: Depdikbud, Dikti, P2LPTK.
Dimyati, M. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fitriana, dkk. 2019. “Pengembangan Modul Matematika Berbasis Learning Cycle 5E untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP)”. Jurnal for Research in Mathematics Learning. 2 (1) : 21-31
Gagne, R. M. 2000. Kondisi Belajar dan Teori Pembelajaran. Terjemahan Munandir. Jakarta: Depdikbud Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi.
Gazali, Rahmita Yuliana. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika untuk Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Teori Belajar Ausubel. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 11 (1). 182 - 192
Hamalik, O. 2010. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran.Jakarta;Bumi Aksara.
Hamdayana, J. 2016: Metodologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Haryonik, Y & Bhakti, Y.B. 2018. “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Lembar Kerja Siswa Dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik”. Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran Vol 6
Hudojo, 2016. Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Jarnawi. 2007. Implementasi Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pendekatan OpenEnded dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Pemahaman Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Studi Eksperimen pada SMP NegeridiKotaBandung). Jurnal Mimbar Pendidikan. 1 (1)
Jauhar, M. 2011. Implementasi Paikem dari Behavioristik sampai konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.
Khabibah. 2006. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika demgan Soal Terbuka untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Disertasi. Surabaya: Program Pascasarjana Unesa
Lestari, Indri. 2018. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Dengan Memanfaatkan Geogebra Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 1(1), 26 – 36.
Maryana, Suaedi, Nurdin. 2019. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Powerpoint dan Ispring Quizmaker pada Materi Teorema Pythagoras. Jurnal Peneitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. 2 (2), 53-61.
Maswatu, S. (2013). Penerapan Model Learning Cycle (Siklus Belajar) Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Siswa Terhadap Konsep Pembelajaran Akuntansi.(online): http://suardimaswatu.blogspot.co.id /2013/03/skripsimodel-pembelajaran-learning.html
Mustofa, Romy Faisal . 2018. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar. Bioedusiana. 3(2) , 51-59.
Ngalimun. 2016. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Aswaja Pressindo
Nieveen, N. 1999. Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Jan Van den Akker, Robert Maribe Braneh, Kent Gustafson, and Tjeerd Plomp (Ed), London : Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Nismalasari, dkk. 2016. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Getaran Harmonis. Edusains.4 (2) : 74-94.
Nurhidayati, S., Tayeb, T., & Baharuddin. (2017). pengembangan bahan ajar matematika berbasis masalah untuk memfasilitasi pencapaian kemampuan penalaran pada pokok bahasan perbandingan kelas vii mtsn model makassar Siti. Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 236–250.
Prastowo, Andi. (2013). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Ramadhana, Rizky., Hadi, Abdul,. 2018. Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematik Berbasis Learning Cycle 7E dengan Pendekatan Saintifik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. 1(1) : 45-52.
Ratumanan, T.W. (2004). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Surabaya : UNESA University Press
Retnowato, Endah dan Pangesti, Pangesti, Fitraning Tyas Puji. 2017. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Geometri SMP Berbabsis Cognitive Load Theory Berorientasi pada Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 12(1), 33-46
Rochmad. 2012. Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran. Jurnal Kreano. 3 (1): 59-72.
Romiszowski. 2000. Designing Instructional System. New York: Nicholas Publishing.
Sanjaya. W. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran “ Berorientasi Standart Proses”. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Slameto. (2013). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Slavin, R.E. (1983) Using Student Team Learning ( 3 rd. ed ). Baltimore, : Johns Hopkins University, Centre For Research On Elementary And Middle Schools.
Sriyanto. 2007. Strategi Sukses Menguasai Matematika. Yogyakarta: Indonesia Cerdas.
Sudijono, Anas. 2011. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta; Raja Grafindo Persada
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suherman, A. 2009. Dasar-dasar Penjaskes. Jakarta : Depdikbud.
Sujarwo, dkk. 2019. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Untuk Pembelajaran Matematika Bagi Siswa Tunarungu. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education. 5(2), 87-94.
Susanto, A. 2014. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Tegeh., Sudatha. 2015. Desain Multimedia Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta. Media Akademi.
Thiagarajan, Sivasailan, dkk. (1974). Instructional Development for Trining Teacher of Exceptional Children: A Source Book. Washington D.C.: National Center for Improvement of Educational System.
Trianto. 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif.Surabaya:Kencana.
Trianto. 2011. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta : Kencana
Triyono. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Wena made. 2009. Strategi pembelajaran inovatif kontemporer. Jakarta : Bumi aksara.
Windiarti, Z. (2014). Perbedaan Kemampuan Penalaran Adaptif Siswa yang Diajar Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 7e dengan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional pada Materi Luas Permukaan Balok Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 17 Tesis. Surabaya.
Copyright (c) 2023 Belman Mangapul R Horbo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in EDUKASIA. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
EDUKASIA's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, EDUKASIA permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and EDUKASIA on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. EDUKASIA will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JOSI will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that EDUKASIA entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
EDUKASIA will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. EDUKASIA's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
