Design Thinking Sebagai Metode Inovatif dalam Perancangan Aplikasi M-Physics
Abstract
In the ever-evolving digital era, learning applications have become indispensable tools in the educational process. This research delves into the utilization of Design Thinking as an innovative methodology for crafting M-Physics applications. The study delineates the steps involved in Design Thinking, which encompass empathy, definition, ideation, and prototyping. The findings demonstrate that Design Thinking aids researchers in gaining a deeper understanding of user needs, articulating problems more precisely, generating creative ideas, and ultimately, devising more innovative solutions. The foundation of the M-Physics prototype design lies in presenting material in a manner that is both succinct and detailed, aligning with the principles of generative learning. M-Physics aims to assist learners, particularly students, in comprehending physics material. Future research should endeavor to complete the Design Thinking process through to the testing stage, ensuring the production of a comprehensive product that truly meets user needs. The insights gleaned from this research are anticipated to be of value to other educational application developers seeking to incorporate a Design Thinking approach into their design processes.
Downloads
References
Burden, K., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Hall, T. (2019). Investigating the use of innovative mobile pedagogies for school-aged students: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 138, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.008
Chen, M., Yu, S., & Chiang, F. (2016). A dynamic ubiquitous learning resource model with context and its effects on ubiquitous learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143846
Ehsanpur, S., & Razavi, M. R. (2020). A Comparative analysis of learning, retention, learning and study strategies in the traditional and M-learning systems. European Review of Applied Psychology, 70(6), 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2020.100605
Ercikan, K., & Oliveri, M. E. (2016). In Search of Validity Evidence in Support of the Interpretation and Use of Assessments of Complex Constructs: Discussion of Research on Assessing 21st Century Skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209210
Eryılmaz, H. (2004). The effect of peer instruction on high school students’ achievement and attitudes toward physics. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/14040
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9
Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
Hanke, U. (2012). Generative Learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1356–1358). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_171
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020). Understanding academics’ adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857
McCarthy, K. S., Likens, A. D., Johnson, A. M., Guerrero, T. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Metacognitive Overload!: Positive and Negative Effects of Metacognitive Prompts in an Intelligent Tutoring System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0164-5
Panke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 66–81.
Riyanti, H., Suciati, S., & Karyanto, P. (2018). Enhancing Studentsâ€TM Logical-Thinking Ability in Natural Science Learning with Generative Learning Model. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i3.16612
Santos, J., Simões Figueiredo, A., & Vieira, M. (2018). Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
Singh, C. (2014). What can we learn from PER: Physics Education Research? The Physics Teacher, 52. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4902211
Copyright (c) 2023 Nurussaniah Nurussaniah, Maurish Sofie Rahmi Batita, Saida Ulfa, Henry Praherdhiono, Ira Nofita Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in EDUKASIA. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
EDUKASIA's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, EDUKASIA permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and EDUKASIA on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. EDUKASIA will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JOSI will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that EDUKASIA entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
EDUKASIA will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. EDUKASIA's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
