Analisis Perbedaan Proses dan Hasil Pendidikan Pesantren Salafiyah dan Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam (PTKI) Untuk Merumuskan Model Pendidikan Islam Transformatif
Abstract
One of the aims of establishing Islamic boarding schools and religious colleges (PTKI) is to produce a cadre of ulama' (experts in Islamic science). These two institutions have their own ways and processes in realizing their goals. Because of the differences in methods and processes, the results are also different. This article reveals the process of education at Salafiyah Islamic boarding schools and education at Islamic religious colleges. This article also reveals the results of Islamic boarding schools and education from Islamic religious universities. This research approach is qualitative, interviews and observation are the main instruments for data collection. The results of this research are that, in the educational process at Islamic boarding schools, almost all of the teaching materials come from the classical book. The methods are bandongan, sorogan and deliberation. The results of education from Salafiyah Islamic boarding schools are that graduates have more mastery of religious texts but lack contextual courage. Meanwhile, in the PTKI religious higher education process, the teaching materials come from various sources, both classical books and modern literature, the learning method mostly uses the discussion method. PTKI Education Results More contextual courage but most do not master religious texts in depth. Each of the two institutions, both Islamic boarding schools and PTKI, has weaknesses and strengths.
Downloads
References
Al-Albani, Muhammad Nashiruddin, Abu Rania, Fajar AInayati, Ahmad Yuswaji, Fakhturrazi, Facrurazi, dan Edi Fr. 2007. Shahih Sunan Tirmidzi. Pustaka Azzam.
Aris, Aris, dan Syukron Syukron. 2020. “PERBANDINGAN METODE BANDONGAN DAN SOROGAN DALAM MEMAHAMI KITAB SAFINATUNNAJAH.” TSAQAFATUNA : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam 2(1):1–10. doi: 10.54213/tsaqafatuna.v2i1.37.
Arista, Riska Fajar. 2015. “PLAGIARISME DI KALANGAN MAHASISWA.” Paradigma 3(2).
Azra, Azyumardi. 1999. Esei-esei intelektual Muslim dan pendidikan Islam. Logos Wacana Ilmu.
Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. 2011. Tradisi pesantren: studi pandangan hidup kyai dan visinya mengenai masa depan Indonesia. Cet. 8 rev. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Fuad, A. Jauhar. 2018. “Upaya Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Menangkal Paham Radikal di Sekolah.” 11.
Haedari, Amin. 2007. “Transformasi pesantren.” Jakarta: Media Nusantara.
Hakim, Arif Rahman. 2015. “METODE PENGAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DI PERGURUAN TINGGI.” Al-Mabsut : Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial 9(2):259–67. doi: 10.56997/almabsut.v9i2.97.
Hidayat, Achmad, dan Zaenal Arifin. 2020. “Narasi Fikih Kebangsaan Di Pesantren Lirboyo.” Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman 10(3):315–28. doi: 10.33367/ji.v10i3.1491.
Imron, Arifin. 2004. “Kepemimpinan Kyai dalam Perubahan Manajemen Pondok Pesantren.”
Jabali, Fuad, dan IAIN Jamhari. 2002. “Modernisasi Islam di Indonesia (Jakarta).”
Madjid, Nurcholis. 1997. Bilik-bilik pesantren: sebuah potret perjalanan. Paramadina.
Mastuhu. 1994. Dinamika sistem pendidikan pesantren: suatu kajian tentang unsur dan nilai sistem pendidikan pesantren. INIS.
Mudzhar, Atho. 2008. “Pesantren Transformatif: Respon Pesantren Terhadap Perubahan Sosial.” EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan.
Nashichuddin, Ach. 2006. “Sufism in Java: The Meeting Point Between Sufism and Javanese Mysticism.” El Harakah 8(1):43.
Naufal, Hanif, Indika Irkhamni, dan Milda Yuliyani. 2020. “PENELITIAN PENERAPAN PROGRAM SISTEM KREDIT SEMESTER MENUNJANG TEREALISASINYA MERDEKA BELAJAR DI SMA NEGERI 1 PEKALONGAN.” Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Pendidikan 1:141–48.
Ridwan, Nasir. 2005. “Mencari Tipologi Format Pendidikan Ideal.” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rohman, Fathur. 2017. “Pembelajaran Fiqih Berbasis Masalah Melalui Kegiatan Musyawarah Di Pondok Pesantren Al-Anwar Sarang Rembang.” Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 8(2):179–200. doi: 10.24042/atjpi.v8i2.2124.
Shiddiq, Ahmad. 2016. “Tradisi Akademik Pesantren: Perubahan Sistem Manajemen Dari Tradisional Ke Modern.” FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Manajemen Islam 4(2). doi: 10.32806/jf.v4i2.2748.
Steenbrink, Karel A. 1986. “Pesantren, madrasah, sekolah: pendidikan Islam dalam kurun moderen.” (No Title).
Syaifulloh, Muhammad. 2016. “Pendidikan Transformatif dalam Perspektif Sejarah.” SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora 2(1).
Wahid, KH Abdurrahman. 2001. Menggerakkan Tradisi; Esai-Esai Pesantren. LKIS Pelangi Aksara.
Windariyah, Devi Suci. 2018. “Kebertahanan Metode Hafalan Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab.” TA’LIM : Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam 1(2):309–24. doi: 10.52166/talim.v1i2.954.
Zarnuji, Imam. 1203. Ta’lim Muta’allim.
Copyright (c) 2024 Anis Humaidi, Najihatul Fadhliyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in EDUKASIA. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
EDUKASIA's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, EDUKASIA permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and EDUKASIA on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. EDUKASIA will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JOSI will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that EDUKASIA entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
EDUKASIA will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. EDUKASIA's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.