Metafora Korupsi dalam Bahasa Indonesia di Portal Berita Daring

  • Johar Amir Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Alifia Afdani Anwar Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muh. Saleh Universitas Negeri Makassar
Keywords: Categorization; Corruption; Metaphor; Conceptual Mapping

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe: (1) categorization of corruption metaphors in Indonesian on online news portals, (2) conceptual mapping of corruption metaphors in Indonesian on online news portals. This type of research is qualitative research. Researchers categorize metaphors using embodiment theory, which is the theory of uniting physical experience with human cognition proposed by Lakoff and Johnson. The results of the study show that there are seven categories of corruption metaphors in Indonesian on online news portals. The seven categorizations are corruption as a journey, corruption as a power, corruption as food, corruption as an enemy, corruption as a plant, corruption as a disease, and corruption as an object. In addition to these categories, there are also subcategories of corruption as power, namely corruption as natural power and corruption as psychological power. Then, it was also found that there were also subcategories of corruption as objects, namely corruption as a building and corruption as a tool, conceptual mapping of corruption metaphors in Indonesian ahasa on online news portals has been carried out in the categories of corruption as a journey, corruption as a force with subcategories of natural power and psychological power, corruption as food, corruption as an enemy, corruption as a plant, corruption as a disease, and corruption as an object with a subcategory of buildings and tools. All of these categories have been equipped with a conceptual mapping model which is shown by the semantic characteristics mapped between the target domain and the source domain along with explanations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badudu, J.S. 1985. Pelik-Pelik Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: CV Pustaka Utama. Chaer, Abdul., dan Agustina. 2010. Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, Abdul. 2012. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Denise, M. 2011. Pesan, Tanda, dan Makna. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Djajasudarma, T., Fatimah. 2006. Metode Linguistik: AncanganMetode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Evans, dan Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Haula, Baiq, dan Tajudin Nur. 2019. “Konseptualisasi Metafora dalam Rubrik Opini Kompas: Kajian Semantik Kognitif” dalam RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, Volume 12 No. 1, Februari 2019 hlm. 25-35.
Keraf, Gorys. 2009. Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Kovecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kreidler, Charles W. 1998. Introducing English Semantic. London: Routledge. Lakoff, George dan Johnson, Mark. 2003. “ Metaphors We Live By”. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Lyra, H. M., dkk. 2006. Citra Hate “Hati” dalam Metafora Orientasional dalam Bahasa Sunda. Metalingua, 14(2), 168-175.
Masthuroh, Siti Ayu. 2020. “Konseptualisasi Metafora Narkoba: Kajian Linguistik Kognitif” dalam Jurnal Skripta Vol. 6 Nomor 1, Maret 2020. PBSI UPY.
Miles, Mattew B., dan A. Michael Huberman. 1992. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Method.
Moleong, L. J. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyadi. 2010. “Metafora Emosi dalam Bahasa Indonesia”. Makalah disajikan pada Seminar Internasional Austronesia V di Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, 19-20 Juli 2010.
Nababan, Sry Gledis Octolya . 2015. “Metafora Penyakit dalam Bahasa Indonesia”. Medan: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya USU. Tersedia dari: https://123dok.com/document/y9d597rq-metafora-penyakit-dalam-bahasa- indonesia.html . Diakses 20 Oktober 2021.
Nirmala, Deli. 2014. “Proses Kognitif dalam Ungkapan Metaforis. Jurnal Parole, 4(1): 1-13.
Pateda, Mansoer. 2001. Semantik Leksikal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Rajeg, I Made. 2009. Metaphoric and Metonymic Conceptualisation of Love in Indonesian. Skripsi. Universitas Udayana.
Ritonga, Parlaungan. 2008. “Analisis Semantik Bahasa Indonesia Pers Studi Kasus Harian Waspada dan Sinar Indonesia Baru”. Tesis. Tersedia dari: http://repository.usu.ac.id. Diakses pada 12 November 2021.
Saeed, J. 2003. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Inc.
Silalahi. 2005. Strategi Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Surabaya: Batavia Press.
Siregar, Rumnasari K. 2013. “Metafora Cinta dalam Bahasa Angkola”. Jurnal Kajian Linguistik (online). Tersedia dari: http://usupress.usu.ac.id. Diakses pada 1 Oktober 2021.
Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana university Press.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharso dan Ana Retnoningsih. 2014. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Semarang: Widya Karya.
Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H.J. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics.London: Longman.
Vanoye, Francis. 1971. Expression Communication. Paris: Armand.
Published
2024-06-06
How to Cite
Amir, J., Anwar, A. A., & Saleh, M. (2024). Metafora Korupsi dalam Bahasa Indonesia di Portal Berita Daring. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 927-938. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i1.901