Integration of Local Cultural Visualization in the DACAR Model to Develop Early Childhood Creativity

Gusmaniarti Gusmaniarti; Shoffan Shoffa; Wahono Wahono; Fira  May Zahra

doi:10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1416

Authors

Gusmaniarti Gusmaniarti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Shoffan Shoffa Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Wahono Wahono Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Fira May Zahra Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1416

Keywords:

Early Childhood Education, DACAR Model, Visual Technology, Local Wisdom, Pretest–Posttest, Creativity

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating local-wisdom-based visual technology into the DACAR learning model (Description, Analysis, Story, Reflection) to enhance cognitive and creative abilities in early childhood. Conducted at TK ABA 69 Surabaya with 27 children aged 5–6 years, this research employed a descriptive quantitative approach with a one-group pretest–posttest design. Seven indicators of cognitive and creative development were assessed using a 1–3–5 scoring rubric. Data were collected through observation and task-based instruments and analyzed using paired t-tests for normally distributed data or Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Tests if normality was not met. Descriptive statistics and visualizations complemented the analysis. Results showed that while posttest scores improved across all indicators, only one—children’s ability to ask relevant questions—demonstrated statistically significant improvement (median = 0.5; CI = 0.5–1; p < 0.05). Other indicators, such as curiosity, analysis, connection to prior experience, creative output, imagination, and local culture recognition, showed nonsignificant changes (median = 0–0.5; p > 0.05). These findings indicate that visual technology effectively supports contextual questioning but is insufficient to foster higher-order thinking and creativity within a short intervention period. Contributing factors include prior familiarity with local culture and limited learning duration. This study recommends expanding assessment tools, applying project-based learning, and integrating digital–physical media to better stimulate exploration, critical thinking, and creativity in early childhood education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriliani, A. T. N., Latifah, A., Sahroni, D., & Farida, N. A. (2023). Early children education based on local culture. Scientia, 2(2), 1–6.

Aldridge, G., Wu, L., Seguin, J. P., Robinson, J., Battaglia, E., Olivier, P., & Yap, M. B. H. (2024). Embedding Technology-Assisted Parenting Interventions in Real-World Settings to Empower Parents of Children With Adverse Childhood Experiences: Co-Design Study. JMIR Formative Research, 8(1), e55639.

Annuar, H., Solihatin, E., & Khaerudin, K. (2024). THE IMPACT OF GAME-BASED LEARNING ON COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT IN EARLY CHILDHOOD: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. Proceedings of International Conference on Education, 2(1), 676–686.

Aulakh, D., Rajiv, R. A., Goyal, P., Garg, A., Khurana, S., Singh, A., & Singh, P. (n.d.). Assessing the Impact of Creative Tasks on Cognitive and Imaginative Development in Children.

Badruli, M., Wahyuni, S., & Misrin, H. (2019). Moral Value of Local Wisdom-Based Learning At University of Muhammadiyah Surabaya: Indonesian Case. Humanities & Social Sciences Review, 7(3), 382–388.

Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166.

Daher, W., & Shahbari, J. A. (2020). Design of STEM activities: Experiences and perceptions of prospective secondary school teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(4), 112–128.

Emi, C., Sardin, S., Pramudia, J. R., Sukmana, C., & Ferianti, F. (2024). Educational Technology in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Literature Review. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 35, 38–45.

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 178–189.

Gurel, D. K. (2016). The effect of hands-on science demonstrations on elementary students’ curiosity. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1722(1).

Jaenudin, R., Chotimah, U., Farida, F., & Syarifuddin, S. (2020). Student development zone: Higher order thinking skills (hots) in critical thinking orientation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(9), 11–19.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3 & 4).

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16–46.

Kusnadi, U., & Ismail, M. H. (2020). Stimulating Children’s Creativity Using the Pragmatic Approach. International Conference on Early Childhood Education and Parenting 2019 (ECEP 2019), 264–269.

Lopatovska, I. (2016). Engaging young children in visual literacy instruction. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–5.

Lubis, W. H., Gurning, B. F., & Yus, A. (2023). Mengembangkan Kecerdasan Emosional Anak Melalui Gaya Belajar Kooperatif di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Generasi Ceria Indonesia, 1(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.47709/geci.v1i2.3178

Mantei, J., & Kervin, L. (2014). Interpreting the Images in a Picture Book: Students Make Connections to Themselves, Their Lives and Experiences. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(2), 76–92.

Mao, Q., & Hong, J.-C. (2025). An Exploration of the Value of Artwork in an Integrated STEAM Competition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101857.

Muntomimah, S., & Wijayanti, R. (2021). The importance of STEAM loose part learning effectiveness in early childhood cognitive learning. 2nd Annual Conference on Social Science and Humanities (ANCOSH 2020), 47–52.

Nabavi, R. T. (2012). Bandura’s social learning theory & social cognitive learning theory. Theory of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 1–24.

Nurhikmayati, I. (2019). Implementasi STEAM dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Didactical Mathematics, 1(2), 41–50.

Oppong, S., & Strader, S. (2022). Interventions that matter start with local cultures: Issues and strategies in early childhood care and education interventions in Africa. An ECCE Project Supported by Spencer Foundation/Boston College. Https://Doi. Org/10.13140/RG, 2(12651.82722), 1.

Ortiz-Alvarez, A., & Arenas, R. (2025). A phenomenological exploration of the contextual variability of stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 106120.

Özkan, G., & Topsakal, U. U. (2020). The Impact of Nature Education on Turkish Students’ Affective Tendencies towards the Environment and Scientific Curiosity. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(2), 95–101.

Pereira, J. V, Vila-Nova, F., Veiga, G., Lopes, F., & Cordovil, R. (2024). Associations between outdoor play features and children’s behavior and health: A systematic review. Health & Place, 87, 103235.

Piasecka, M. (2022). The Phenomenon of Imagination in Contemporary Education. Competence Essential for the Development of Children Supported by the Creative Visualisation Technique. Podstawy Edukacji, 15, 217–237.

Prasad‘Pandey, M. (2025). Exploring STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Toys in Kindergarten: Teachers’ Pedagogical Approaches, Perspective and Effect on Children’s Brain Development: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 100736.

PRIYANTI, N., MANGUNWIBAWA, A. A., NURASIAH, S., MUSAROFAH, M., EMILIANA, W., & SUPARMINAH, M. (2023). WORKSHOP OPTIMALISASI BELAJAR TRANSISI PAUD KE SD MELALUI PLATFORM MERDEKA MENGAJAR (PMM) PADA SATUAN PAUD DI KOTA TANGERANG SELATAN. Community: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 38–45.

Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.

Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75.

Rahayu, E. Y., Nurani, Y., & Meilanie, S. M. (2023). Pembelajaran yang terinspirasi STEAM: Menumbuhkan keterampilan berpikir kritis melalui video tutorial. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(3), 2627–2640.

Sakti, S. A., Endraswara, S., & Rohman, A. (2024a). Integrating local cultural values into early childhood education to promote character building. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 84–101.

Sakti, S. A., Endraswara, S., & Rohman, A. (2024b). Revitalizing local wisdom within character education through ethnopedagogy apporach: A case study on a preschool in Yogyakarta. Heliyon, 10(10).

Shipe, B. (2018). Facilitating Productive Encounters with Difference: A Visual Essay. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education (Online), 35, 291–295.

Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101.

Sulistyaningtyas, R. E., Astuti, F. P., & Yuliantoro, P. (2023). Using technology for learning in early childhood education: A review of asian countries. Journal Of Education And Teaching Learning (JETL), 5(1), 46–56.

Sun, Q., Wang, C., Dai, D. Y., & Li, X. (2025). Developmental effects of digitally contextualized reading on preschooler’s creative thinking: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 259, 106307.

Sutiyono, A., Hastomo, T., & Tanod, M. J. (2022). Educators’ perception towards early childhood education in technology integration: A case study. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(6), 7323–7333.

Watson, P., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Ertl, B. (2023). The Routledge International Handbook of Gender Beliefs, Stereotype Threat, and Teacher Expectations. Taylor & Francis Group.

Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 119–140.