The Impact of SARD-Based Cooperative Learning with the Patik Bali Application on Motivation and Learning Outcomes in Balinese Script Instruction Abstract

I Kadek Eka Muliana; Nengah Martha; I Putu Mas Dewantara

doi:10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1459

Authors

I Kadek Eka Muliana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Nengah Martha Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
I Putu Mas Dewantara Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1459

Keywords:

SARD-based cooperative learning; Patik Bali application; Balinese script instruction; Student motivation; Learning outcomes; Educational technology; Indigenous language education

Abstract

Balinese script learning in schools still faces obstacles of low motivation and student learning outcomes due to the use of conventional models that do not actively involve students. The study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) type cooperative learning model based on the Patik Bali application on students' motivation and learning outcomes in writing Balinese script. This study uses a quasi-experimental design method with the subjects of class X students of SMA Negeri 10 Denpasar which is divided into experimental classes and control classes. The instruments used included learning outcome tests and learning motivation questionnaires. Data analysis was carried out using the MANOVA test to see the effect of the learning model on two variables that rotate simultaneously. The results of the study show that the Patik Bali application-based STAD model has a positive and significant influence on student motivation and learning outcomes. The average learning motivation of the experimental class was 72.78 and the learning outcome was 81.86 higher than the control class which obtained an average motivation of 61.25 and learning outcomes of 75.25. These findings show that the integration of technology through the Patik Bali application in the cooperative learning model can increase student participation and understanding in Balinese script learning. This research offers a new contribution by integrating the culture-based Patik Bali application into the STAD cooperative learning model specifically designed for Balinese literacy learning and combining regional language preservation with digital pedagogy to improve student motivation and learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, S. A., Kusumawardani, Z. H. N., Suprayitno, N. F., & Jafar, N. (2023). Driving Factors of Motivation and Its Contribution to Enhance Performance. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), Article 2.

Abdullah, A. A., & Rochmadi, T. (2020). Student Perceptions Towards Moodle and Kahoot Based e-Learning in Learning Mathematics. Proceeding International Conference on Science and Engineering, 3(April), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.14421/icse.v3.519

Adair, D., & Jaeger, M. (2016). Incorporating Critical Thinking into an Engineering Undergraduate Learning Environment. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p23

Adams, T. L. (2020). Mathematical Literacy. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(4), 262–263. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtlt.2019.0397

Afamasaga-Fuata’i, K. (2008). Students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking. Amt, 64(2), 8–17.

Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with Learning: Motivation, Affect and Cognition in Interest Processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0

Aksu, G., & Koruklu, N. (2015). Determination the Effects of Vocational High School Students’ Logical and Critical Thinking Skills on Mathematics Success. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(59), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.59.11

Amirali, M. (2010). Students’ Conceptions of the Nature of Mathematics and Attitudes towards Mathematics Learning. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 4(1), 27–41.

Anjaeni, M. (2021). Effect of Application of the Discovery learning Model on Mathematics Learning outcomes of Elementary Students. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 4(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v4i6.70552

Apiola, M., & Sutinen, E. (2020). Design science research for learning software engineering and computational thinking: Four cases. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22291

Ardiyani, S. M., Gunarhadi, G., & Riyadi, R. (2018). REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING VIEWED FROM LEARNING ACTIVITY. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5392.301-310

Baafi, R. kwabena akrofi, & Atieno, L. (2020). INTERACTIVE MEDIA IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A STRATEGY FOR ENHANCING STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND CULTURAL INTEGRATION. 16th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education, 575–583. https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-20-245

Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., & Doleck, T. (2018). Grit , Mindset , and Academic Performance: A Study of Pre- University Science Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12).

Benakli, N., Kostadinov, B., Satyanarayana, A., & Singh, S. (2017). Introducing computational thinking through hands-on projects using R with applications to calculus , probability and data analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 393–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1254296

Coleman, K. (2023). Generative AI and education ecologies. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(1), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v5i1.175

Dagienė, V., & Stupurienė, G. (2016). Bebras – a Sustainable Community Building Model for the Concept Based Learning of Informatics and Computational Thinking. Informatics in Education, 15(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2016.02

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Demirel, M., & Coşkun, Y. D. (2010). A study on the assesment of undergraduate students’ learning preference. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4429–4435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.706

Deschryver, M. D., & Yadav, A. (2015). Creative and Computational Thinking in the Context of New Literacies: Working with Teachers to Scaffold Complex Technology-Mediated Approaches to Teaching and Learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(3), 411–431.

Hariyanto, H., Amin, M., Mahanal, S., & Rohman, F. (2022). Analyzing the Contribution of Critical Thinking Skills and Social Skills on Students’ Character by Applying Discovery Learning Models. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(1), 42–53.

Kington, A., Gates, P., & Sammons, P. (2013). Development of social relationships, interactions and behaviours in early education settings. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 11(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X13492936

Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers and Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009

Kulsum, U., & Nugroho, S. E. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Komunikasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v3i2.3600

Lannin, J., Barker, D., & Townsend, B. (2006). Algebraic Generalisation Strategies " Factors Influencing Student Strategy Selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3–28.

Learning, P. (2001). Features of Problem-Based Learning. Winter, 11(1), 1–8.

Liu, P. (2016). Technology Integration in Elementary Classrooms: Teaching Practices of Student Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.6

Maghfiroh, O. W., & Diana, D. (2016). The Effect of Stick Box Portable Game to Increase Basic Mathematics Ability Children Five to Six Age (Study Eksperimen in Aisyiyah Bustanul Athfal Kindergarten Kaliwungu). BELIA: Early Childhood Education Papers, 5(1), 40–44.

Masood, Z., & Hoda, R. (2014). Math Tutor: An Interactive Android-Based Numeracy Application for Primary Education. https://play.google.com

Muller, A. E., Hafstad, E. V., Himmels, J. P. W., Smedslund, G., Flottorp, S., Stensland, S. Ø., Stroobants, S., Van de Velde, S., & Vist, G. E. (2020). The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review. Psychiatry Research, 293(July), 113441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441

Pettersson, K., Stadler, E., & Tambour, T. (2013). Development of students’ understanding of the threshold concept of function. The Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8), Manavgat-Side, Antalya, Turkey, 6-10 February 2013, 2005. http://cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG14/WG14_Pettersson.pdf

Promraksa, S., Sangaroon, K., & Inprasitha, M. (2014). Characteristics of Computational Thinking about the Estimation of the Students in Mathematics Classroom Applying Lesson Study and Open Approach. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n3p56

Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. (2018). Using Technology to Support Teaching Computer Science: A Study with Middle School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94227

Santoso, H. B., Schrepp, M., Yugo Kartono Isal, R., Utomo, A. Y., & Priyogi, B. (2016). Measuring user experience of the student-centered E-learning environment. Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 1–79.

Shanmugam, L., Yassin, S. F., & Khalid, F. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Motivation to Learn Computational Thinking through Mobile Application Development Module (M-CT). International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(5), 1293–1303.

Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.429

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tarigan, I. V. (2020). Peningkatkan Kemampuan Mengritik Isi Teks Ceramah Dengan Model Pembelajaran Circ (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) Siswa Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 1 Tigapanah Tahun Pelajaran 20202021. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran: JPPP, 1(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.30596/jppp.v1i2.5390

Tarim, K., & Akdeniz, F. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on Turkish elementary students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics using TAI and STAD methods. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9088-y

Tee, K. N., Leong, K. E., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2018). The Mediating Effects of Critical Thinking Skills on Motivation Factors for Mathematical Reasoning Ability. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0396-z

Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers’ pedagogical discourse: A commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1165–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1034206

Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029

Yulandra, R., & Pujiastuti, P. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran STAD Dan SAVI untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Mandurian Kabupaten Tapin Kalimantan Selatan. JURNAL ILMIAH DIDAKTIKA: Media Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 19(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v19i1.4197