Integration Design Thinking to Develop Empathy, Collaboration, and Environmental Responsibility Character in Elementary School

Kustiarini Kustiarini; Yusroh  Alquriyah; Moch Bayu  Ibrahim S

doi:10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1601

Authors

Kustiarini Kustiarini UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Yusroh Alquriyah Institut Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Pacitan
Moch Bayu Ibrahim S Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1601

Keywords:

Design Thinking; Empathy; Collaboration; Environmental Responsibility; Elementary School

Abstract

This study aims to explore the implementation of the Design Thinking approach in cultivating empathy, collaboration, and environmental responsibility among elementary school students. Conducted at SDN Purwokerto 1, Tayu District, Pati Regency, Central Java, this qualitative case study involved a fifth-grade teacher and students in IPAS (Science and Social Studies) learning. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using an interactive model. The findings reveal that the teacher successfully integrated the five stages of Design Thinking empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test into contextual and collaborative learning activities. Students actively addressed real-life environmental issues, particularly waste management at the school, which fostered critical thinking, creativity, and emotional engagement. Evaluations were conducted formatively and reflectively, emphasizing student collaboration, creativity, emotional involvement, and the development of environmental responsibility. The implications of this study suggest that Design Thinking not only enhances conceptual understanding but also nurtures students’ empathy, teamwork, and environmental responsibility. The teacher’s role as a designer of meaningful, student-centered learning experiences that connect classroom learning to authentic contexts is crucial. Future research could explore the long-term effects of Design Thinking on character development and its broader application in diverse educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulraheem, A. W., Arafah, M., & Abdelrahim, S. (2025). Analyzing Digital Media Preferences of Parents in Jordan: A Machine Learning Approach to Content Classification. 2025 1st International Conference on Computational Intelligence Approaches and Applications (ICCIAA), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIAA65327.2025.11013452

Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020). Reflective journaling and metacognitive awareness: insights from a longitudinal study in higher education. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1716708

Avsec, S., Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M., Żabicka, A., Gil-Mastalerczyk, J., & Gawlak, A. (2024). Human-Centered Systems Thinking in Technology-Enhanced Sustainable and Inclusive Architectural Design. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229802

Babalola, S. O. (2024). Students-staff classroom co-creation as model of employability skills development in a Nigerian university. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 1289–1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2024-0061

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2025). What is design thinking and why is it so popular? Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular

Doyle, A., Johnson, M. C., Donlon, E., McDonald, E., & Sexton, P. J. (2021). The role of the teacher as assessor: Developing student teacher’s assessment identity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 46(12), 52–68. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.362219293695726

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2018). Better Learning Through Structured Teaching: A Framework for the Gradual Release of Responsibility. ASCD.

Fisher, W. P., Oon, E. P.-T., & Benson, S. (2021). Rethinking educational assessment from the perspective of design thinking. Educational Design Research, 5(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.5.1.1537

Fotaris, P., & Mastoras, T. (2022). A framework for creating educational escape rooms based on design thinking principles. Education Sciences, 12(11), 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110768

Gonen, E. (2019). Tim Brown, Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation (2009). Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 04. https://doi.org/10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-02-08

Gunter, G. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2021). Using Design Thinking and Formative Assessment to Create an Experience Economy in Online Classrooms. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 5(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-021-00059-5

Hattie, J. (2016). Estrategias de aprendizaje: una síntesis de más de 800 metanálisis relacionados con el rendimiento.

Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mishra, P. (2020). Growth mindset, design thinking, and creativity: Developing a resilience-oriented learning environment. Journal of Educational Change, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09379-4

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Ismail, S., Ali, F., & Yasukawa, S. (2024). Advancing Climate Risk Governance and Education Through UNESCO. Springer Nature Singapore, 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5987-3_13

Jamal, T., Kircher, J., & Donaldson, J. P. (2021). Re-visiting design thinking for learning and practice: Critical pedagogy, conative empathy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020964

Jardinez, M. J., & Natividad, L. R. (2024). The The Advantages and Challenges of Inclusive Education: Striving for Equity in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 12(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v12i2.7182

Jiang, C., & Pang, Y. (2023). Enhancing design thinking in engineering students with project‐based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(4), 814–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22608

Kim, H. J., Yi, P., & Ko, B. W. (2023). Deepening students’ experiences with problem identification and definition in an empathetic approach: Lessons from a university design-thinking program. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2022-0083

Kotsis, K. T. (2025). Optimal STEM Educators for Elementary School: Students from the Primary Education vs. Science Department. Journal of Effective Teaching Methods (JETM), 3(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.360

Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309

Liedtka, J. (2018, September). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/09/why-design-thinking-works

Liu, W., Huang, R., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Ohashi, T., Li, B., Liu, Y., Qiu, D., Yu, R., Zhang, J., Al Mahmud, A., & Leifer, L. (2024). Empathy Design Thinking: cultivating creative minds in primary education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1376305

Malik, K. M., & Zhu, M. (2023). Do project-based learning, hands-on activities, and flipped teaching enhance student’s learning of introductory theoretical computing classes? Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3581–3604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11350-8

Mccurdy, R. P., Nickels, M., & Bush, S. B. (2020). Problem-Based Design Thinking Tasks: Engaging Student Empathy in STEM. In ELECTRONIC JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (Vol. 24, Issue 2).

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, Johnny. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Montero, J. (2022). Developing Empathy Through Design Thinking in Elementary Art Education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12445

Nolan, E. M. (2022). Transcending Lockdown: Fostering Student Imagination through Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning and Creativity in Engineering Design Courses. University of Toronto Quarterly, 91(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.91.1.01

Noweski, C., Scheer, A., & Michel, R. (2012). Design thinking as a tool for interdisciplinary education in sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211265743

Nur, M., & Sabur, F. (2025). Development of Teaching Materials and Harmonized Semester Learning Plan for the Aircraft Basic Workshop Theory Course through Learner-Centered Instructional Design in Indonesian Aviation Polytechnics. Journal La Edusci, 6(1), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v6i2.2244

OECD. (2019). OECD. The future of education and skills. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. 13(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219

Rusmann, A., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2022). When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K-12 level. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2063–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09692-4

Rutakumwa, R., Mugisha, J. O., Bernays, S., Kabunga, E., Tumwekwase, G., Mbonye, M., & Seeley, J. (2020). Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis. Qualitative Research, 20(5), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119884806

Seevaratnam, V., Gannaway, D., & Lodge, J. (2023). Design thinking-learning and lifelong learning for employability in the 21st century. 14(1), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2023vol14no1art1631

Wang, C. C. (2024). Using design thinking for interdisciplinary curriculum design and teaching: a case study in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02813-z

Samsudin, Weda, S., & Amirullah. (2024). IDEAS Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Assessing the Impact of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Approach in Reading Instruction: A Multiple Case Study. 12(2), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas

Zhang, Z., Bekker, T., Markopoulos, P., & Skovbjerg, H. M. (2024). Supporting and understanding students’ collaborative reflection-in-action during design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(1), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09814-0